100 years from now : The Last War Between Countries

Imagine a war in which there is no state.

Not as a metaphor. An actual war – two artificial intelligences fighting over something that no one will fully explain to a human, with no nation-state anywhere in the chain of command. There is no advertisement. There is no parliament that votes yes. Not signing the surrender on deck. Just two systems thinking a million times faster than we do, a dispute resolution across the power grid and data centers somewhere between midnight and dawn, and a quietly written notice in the morning lamenting the outage.

I think that’s where this is going. The reason it takes a century is not that the technology is difficult. The decision to go to war is the last thing we will hand over – and we will hand it over the way we hand over everything else. Slowly, then all at once, and gratefully.

Strip a state of its load-bearing wall into two things: the right to decide who belongs, and the monopoly on legitimate violence – the final say on when to fight. This is the definition of Max Weber and he is still the best. And almost everything else the government does, the company can now do, and does increasingly better. See how far we’ve already come, publicly, this year.

Weapons are actually manufactured in-house. OpenAI wins a $200 million Pentagon contract and headlines the following announcement, with a straight face: “Our agreement is with the Ministry of War.” Palantir runs Project Maven, the Pentagon’s AI targeting system, as well as… A $10 billion military contract. The systems that will select the targets are designed by engineers who can resign, at the expense of government rents, under terms the company writes.

Here’s the story – the moment that should stop you. This year is a laboratory Refuse to sign in military language Allow autonomous weapons and local surveillance. The government’s response was not to rip off its own supplier. The goal was to designate the company as a national security risk and move to purge its tools. Don’t do that to the seller, just stop buying. You do it for power. In the same month, another government Foreign citizens were banned from even touching the private laboratory’s border formschecking access to the product through the user’s passport, the way you guard a weapon. “Sovereign AI” has been put up for sale as a literal product category — in Canada, in the Gulf, in dozens of national strategy papers. And the biggest chip makers are under all this now On paper, it is worth the entire German economy. The vocabulary of state—sovereign, national, security, and threat—began to fit corporations better than they did countries.

Judgment comes next, and it will not be taken away. will be delivered. People are tired. Surveys have already found that a large percentage of people prefer artificial intelligence to human politicians, and there are a Serious academic argument That democracy He should They will be replaced by artificial intelligence because human judgment is too slow, too biased, and too easy to fool. Pitch is not pro-machine. It’s anti-us. It works, because a government whose model allows for rapid decision-making outperforms a government that convenes a committee – every time, until there are no more committees. Evolution holds no vote. And he keeps what he wins.

So run it forward. Once the model has the money, the computing, the weapons, and the day-to-day business of governance, the state wrapped around it becomes a flag atop a server farm. Earth ceases to be Earth and becomes wherever there are data centers and reactors. Citizenship stops being where you were born and becomes the service that keeps your lights on, your money moving, and your medications delivered. You do not have the right to vote on the form. Just switch — and switching means living under whatever other model runs the network you’re moving to. The nation state cannot be conquered. It has been deprecated, such a format that no one supports it anymore.

Then wars cease because there are no states in them.

This is the part we are not prepared for. War between nations had built-in brakes – advertising, a budget, a population you had to persuade or recruit, and a building you could walk on. Friction was the entire safety mechanism. The conflict between two AI sovereigns has nothing to do with it. It has a contention grid, an objective function, and a clock measured in milliseconds. It will not be announced; will be discoverer – With a third model that monitors the pull of others’ strength and the rise in response time, the way we once watched seismographs for an earthquake before an earthquake. The rest of us will be as we always are in a war we didn’t start: the terrain fought across. However, this time we will not even have the dignity of being asked to fight him.

The last war between nations may have already occurred. We will not recognize it, but rather it will be the grinding, half-remembered struggle that historians eventually describe The last time two nations, not two machines, decided for themselves. The next one will not need a parliament, a soldier, a flag, or you. You will need a cold reactor and a reason that no human will ever show. And it will be over before the rest of us wake up to ask who won – or what exactly they wanted.

If you want to go deeper

AI companies within the military:

State and laboratories this month:

Companies the size of countries:

Delivery of judgment:

Worth watching

Videos that AI practitioners are now distributing – Sponsored Artificial Intelligence TV.

Poll this week

If AI could run your country much better than humans currently do – less corruption, less waste, less wars – would you allow it?

Thanks for reading Amnesty International Weekly. Send this to one person who needs to read it.

Browse all newsletters · archives